Case studies · By industry

Three strategic sectors, three ways of looking beneath the surface.

Case studies · Oil & Gas

Eleven thousand km², 16 prospects, five clusters.
All in three months.

When Innoson Oil & Gas secured operatorship of Block 2020a on Sierra Leone's offshore frontier — the conjugate twin of the Guyana basin — it didn't have two years for a classic seismic campaign. Inside Earth characterized the 11,000 km² survey area in a single quarter, identified 16 prospects and leads in five clusters, and delivered a map that Ryder Scott turned into a P50 CPR of 8.4 TCF of gas and 234 MMbbl of condensate.

Análisis de prospectos de petróleo y gas
Case 01 · Sierra Leone 2021—2023

Block 2020a Offshore — Innoson Oil & Gas

Equatorial Atlantic basin  ·  conjugate twin of Guyana  ·  Ryder Scott P50 CPR  ·  3-month lead time

Innoson Oil & Gas Ltd —an independent operator from the Gulf of Guinea— secured operatorship of Block 2020a on Sierra Leone's offshore platform in 2020-2021. The concession covers 8,035 km² in waters from 600 to 1,000 m deep, on a passive Atlantic margin that tectonic reconstruction allows to fit precisely with the Guyana basin —where 9 Bbbl of reserves have been confirmed and up to 15 Bbbl are projected.

The Inside Earth program covered an 11,000 km² survey area —the block plus a margin fringe— with a 3-month lead time. The methodology combined three ERS (Earth Remote Sensing) phases: multiband satellite reconnaissance, NMR delineation processing, and a DHI deep-sounding field survey. Ryder Scott Company (Houston) acted as independent technical advisor and issued the CPR for prospective resources.

2021—2023 Innoson Oil & Gas Ltd Block 2020a PA Guyana conjugate margin Ryder Scott CPR · Jan 2022
11,000km²
Survey area
8,035km²
Block area
16
Prospects + leads
5
Clusters
8.4TCF
Gas P50 · Ryder Scott
234MMbbl
Condensate P50
Geological context

Sierra Leone, conjugate twin of the Guyana basin — one of the most prolific petroleum frontiers in the world.

Atlantic conjugate margin

Two decades ago, the major hydrocarbon discoveries in West and Equatorial Africa redirected exploratory attention toward the conjugate margins of the South Atlantic. The Guyana basin, off northern South America, has become one of the most prolific basins in the world: 9 Bbbl of confirmed reserves and a satellite potential estimated at up to 15 Bbbl.

Sierra Leone, with more than 400 km of Atlantic coastline, can be tectonically reconstructed to fit precisely with the Guyana basin. It is, geologically speaking, its eastern twin — with stratigraphic and structural analogues that support first-order exploratory interest.

The Sierra Leone offshore is well covered by 2D and 3D seismic and confirms a mature petroleum system in the deep section. The challenge was not regional prospectivity, but block-level characterization: identifying where, at what depth, and with what fluid the reservoirs sit inside Block 2020a.

The Inside Earth approach
Bloque 2020a — área de estudio satelital offshore Sierra Leona

Innoson Oil & Gas set the program with three conditions: cover 11,000 km² in a single pass, keep the lead time to roughly one quarter, and rely on Ryder Scott's independent audit over the resulting volumes.

Inside Earth executed a three-phase ERS workflow: multisensor satellite reconnaissance, NMR delineation processing, and a DHI deep-sounding field survey over the anomalous zones. Integration with legacy seismic allowed Innoson to purchase only 1,000 km of 2D lines (out of the 4,000 km available), focused over the already-delineated anomalies.

The result was a complete characterization of the block — 16 prospects and leads in 5 clusters: Sena, Lauda, Piquet, Fangio, Jupiter — with average reservoir top at -2,700 m TVDSS, thicknesses of 180 to 240 m, and traps of tectonic-stratigraphic origin.

Methodology · Earth Remote Sensing

Three ERS phases — from satellite reconnaissance to deep NMR sounding.

The ERS workflow applied to Block 2020a is sequential: each phase qualifies or discards the next, and each phase adds an additional layer of information about the HC anomalies. Seismic investment and drilling decisions are taken at the end, on bidirectional remote + seismic evidence.

Phase 01 · ERS I
Reconnaissance

Multisensor satellite imagery.

Time series, multispectral and hyperspectral imagery processed to extract spectral reflectance, identify elements, and detect processes —including signs of tectonic faults— using visible, ultraviolet, infrared and radar over 11,000 km². This phase qualifies or disqualifies the area for further investigation.

Qualifies the area
Phase 02 · ERS II
NMR Delineation

HC anomalies mapped.

The high-resolution multisensor dataset is processed to filter noise and amplify anomalous signals indicative of hydrocarbon accumulation. Delineation accuracy is achieved through proprietary radiation treatment of analogue imagery and the nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) signature of the sample resource. Output: 5 anomalous clusters · 16 prospects/leads.

Delineates and ranks
Phase 03 · ERS Field Survey
DHI · deep sounding

NMR + point electromagnetic.

Deep sounding of the anomalous zones with resonance-frequency-modulated waves that trigger a unique NMR response from the target. Surface receivers allow accurate contouring of the anomaly, and point electromagnetic sounding provides spatial accumulation intensities and depths. This is the DHI (Direct Hydrocarbon Indicator) that drives the drilling.

DHI · drives drilling
Bidirectional corroboration. ERS I & II findings are cross-checked against legacy seismic interpretation (velocity analysis and pre-stack Kirchhoff time migration) over the 1,000 km of 2D lines acquired within the anomalous zones. The match between seismic bright spots, gas-fluid contacts and NMR anomalies confirms the inventory before phase III.
The block, anomaly by anomaly

From satellite imagery to structural trap — all without drilling.

NMR processing over the multisensor imagery revealed five clear anomalous zones inside Block 2020a. Legacy seismic acquired only over those zones confirmed the anomalies as bright spots and provided the structural geometry of the traps.

01 · Anomaly map

Five clusters on satellite-derived imagery.

Apart from the polygon coordinates, Inside Earth received no oil samples, chemical composition or well information. Image processing and NMR nevertheless identified five clear anomalous groupings —Sena, Lauda, Piquet, Fangio, Jupiter— accounting for the 16 prospects and leads on the block.

SIERRA LEONE BLOCK 2020a · 8,035 km² Sena Lauda Piquet Fangio Jupiter

Schematic plan view of the block with the 5 anomalous clusters (proxy representation). Color codes the dominant fluid by cluster.

02 · Legacy seismic + structural trap

From 4,000 km down to 1,000 km of acquired 2D lines.

The anomalies guided the selection of legacy 2D seismic lines crossing the zones. Instead of acquiring the full ~4,000 km dataset, Innoson purchased only 1,000 km over the anomalous zones — a 75 % reduction in seismic area with equivalent interpretation.

Structural interpretation over those lines revealed traps of tectonic-stratigraphic origin. Velocity analysis confirmed the NMR anomalies as bright spots, and pre-stack Kirchhoff migration showed the gas-fluid contact and the local interval-velocity drop predicted.

Trap typeTectonic / Stratigraphic
Area (one of the traps)178 km²
Water depth600 — 1,000 m
Reservoir top (TVDSS)-2,700 m average
Reservoir thickness180 — 240 m
Structural amplitude1,460 m
Acquired seismic1,000 km · 75 % less
3D Model · Block 2020a

Sixteen prospects in five clusters, distributed around -2,700 m TVDSS.

Three-dimensional reconstruction of the 16 prospects and leads identified by Inside Earth and certified by Ryder Scott (CPR January 2022). The five groupings —Sena, Lauda, Piquet, Fangio, Jupiter— sit around the average reservoir top of -2,700 m TVDSS, with documented thicknesses of 180 to 240 m and a structural amplitude of 1,460 m. Colored by dominant fluid. Z axis exaggerated ×8 for legibility.

Isometric view · Block 2020a — 16 prospects · 5 clusters Lat ~7°N · TVDSS -2,700 m average · Z ×8
Gas Gas + condensate Condensate Oil (DHI lead)
Clusters: Sena · Lauda · Piquet · Fangio · Jupiter
Sena
Cluster 01 · NE
4 prospects · gas dominant
Gas
Lauda
Cluster 02 · NW
3 prospects · gas + condensate
Gas / Condensate
Piquet
Cluster 03 · center
3 prospects · condensate dominant
Condensate
Fangio
Cluster 04 · SW · DHI lead
3 prospects · oil-bearing
Oil
Jupiter
Cluster 05 · SE · DHI lead
3 prospects · oil-bearing
Oil
Technical note. The 16 bodies represented are proxy ellipsoids dimensioned from the Ryder Scott report (P50 resources) and the subsequent Innoson Oil & Gas DHI study. The individual geometry of each prospect remains confidential; the model preserves the spatial relationships per cluster, the reservoir-top depths around -2,700 m TVDSS and the 180–240 m thicknesses documented in the report.
Independent technical advisor

The CPR is issued by Ryder Scott, not by us.

On the findings delineated by Inside Earth in Block 2020a, Ryder Scott Company —a petroleum consulting firm with nearly nine decades of independence and a global benchmark for reserves certification— issued in January 2022 the Competent Person Report on prospective resources attributable to the concession.

Ryder
Scott
Petroleum Consultants · Houston
Independent · since 1937

16 prospects + leads, 5 clusters, P50 of 8.4 TCF + 234 MMbbl.

Ryder Scott's Competent Person Report confirmed the 16 prospects and leads identified, organized into the five clusters —Sena, Lauda, Piquet, Fangio and Jupiter— and issued the P50 (median) estimate of prospective resources attributable to the offshore Sierra Leone licensee.

The document, dated 1 January 2022 and signed by Stephen T. Phillips, Tosin Famurewa and Olga Logvinova, places the inventory at 8.4 TCF of gas and 234 MMbbl of oil in the median-case scenario for recoverable resources. It is the technical document of record sustaining the block's current farm-in negotiations.

"An independent assessment conducted by Ryder Scott within the licensed acreage has confirmed 16 prospects and leads, organized into five distinct clusters." — Ryder Scott CPR, January 2022
The DHI study · 2023

After the CPR, the DHI studies revealed an additional 693 million barrels in two lead clusters.

With the gas and condensate inventory certified by Ryder Scott already closed, Inside Earth executed the ERS Field Survey (DHI) phase over the clusters likely to contain oil. NMR + point EM deep sounding revealed an aggregated oil volume in prospective resource category significantly larger than expected.

693MMbbl

Aggregated oil volume in prospective resource category identified by the DHI study over the two lead clusters Fangio and Jupiter on Block 2020a.

DHI (Direct Hydrocarbon Indicator) is the ERS III method: resonance-frequency-modulated waves that trigger a unique NMR response from the target at depth, picked up by surface receivers. It is the phase that eliminates or drastically reduces dry-hole risk.

693,454,650 bbl 2 lead clusters DHI · ERS III Innoson Oil & Gas · 2023
BLOCK 2020a · DHI LEAD CLUSTERS Lauda Piquet Sena Fangio DHI LEAD oil-bearing Jupiter DHI LEAD oil-bearing 693 MMbbl AGGREGATE
Schematic of the two DHI lead clusters. Fangio and Jupiter, in the southern quadrant of the block, concentrate the 693 MMbbl of oil in aggregated prospective resource category after the field survey.
Quote from Innoson Oil & Gas. "Recent DHI remote sensing studies revealed an aggregated prospective resource category volume of MMbbl 693,454,650 of oil, in two lead clusters." Block 2020a went from a certified gas + condensate inventory to a concession that also contains significant oil resource, without drilling a single well.
The value of data

Comparison: seismic-only program vs Inside Earth + focused seismic.

The client started from an assigned area of more than 8,000 km², an estimated exploration term of two years, and a seismic acquisition cost above 5,000 USD/km. Integrating the Inside Earth workflow compressed all of those variables at once.

>75%
Less exploration area

Seismic acquired only over IE anomalous zones — 1,000 km of 2D lines instead of the 4,000 km available in the dataset.

>85%
Less exploration time

3-month lead time to characterize the 11,000 km², compared to the original two-year plan for a conventional exploratory program.

>73%
Economic saving

Combined reduction in seismic cost, lead time, and dry-hole exposure — measured against the operator's original plan for the block.

>5,000t
CO₂ avoided

Carbon emissions avoided by reducing seismic operations and the field-program travel and logistics they require.

Operational implication. Block 2020a moved from "area assigned, two-year exploration ahead" to fully characterized concession with CPR + DHI in a single quarter. The project is currently in farm-in negotiations with the technical inventory already in place — an evaluable asset, not a blank sheet.
Your next offshore block?

Characterize it fully
before the next meter of seismic.

If your operation could benefit from a three-phase ERS workflow —satellite reconnaissance, NMR delineation, and DHI field survey— over an offshore frontier concession, a mature brownfield, or a farm-in block, the Inside Earth technical team can define the scope, the lead time, and the CPR-ready deliverables in a first no-commitment meeting.

Request technical evaluation Download project brief